Early-stage planning for metropolitan medical-drone networks can use demographic and healthcare-facility data to identify equitable and robust candidate nodes while operational evidence is developing. This study presents an equity- and robustness-aware screening framework for candidate healthcare sites in Shenzhen using population, age structure, administrative boundaries, and medical point-of-interest data for 74 sub-districts. A station is defined as a planning-stage dispatch or handover candidate. The demand index is evaluated alongside total population, older population, and equity-balanced objectives. Across 96 configurations that vary candidate pool, service radius, station budget, and objective, we measure citywide and worst-district coverage, solution stability, minimax regret, redundant coverage, and single-node failure. At a 5 km radius and K = 15, equity-balanced screening increases worst-district population coverage from 11.0% to 52.3% in the core pool and from 24.1% to 70.5% in the mixed pool, while retaining 92.0% and 93.8% citywide coverage. The core minimax plan reduces maximum regret from 43.6 to 12.6 percentage points. Single-node analysis identifies concentrated failure exposure, while expansion of the core equity plan from K = 15 to K = 20 raises redundant population coverage from 1.0% to 13.5%, demonstrating a practical pathway for strengthening backup reach. A scenario-based workflow comparison further isolates the trade-off between nearest-station and load-aware dispatch: the latter improves assignment balance with a mean completion-time increase of 0.27 min when other capabilities are equalized. Together, the framework provides an actionable candidate shortlist, identifies priorities for reserve-node placement, and supports the design of subsequent site, route, and workflow pilots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ling et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: