A model of a bubbling fluidized-bed reactor for catalytic methane pyrolysis over a Fe/Al₂Oₜ catalyst is created, checked, and validated using three published experimental datasets. The model is one-dimensional and has two phases, and it follows the Kunii-Levenspiel principle. An axial energy balance, hydrogen inhibition, interphase mass transfer, gas-solid hydrodynamics, and power-law kinetics are all part of the model. The numerical verification reveals that a fourth-order Runge-Kutta solution with 200 axial nodes that is fixed-step agrees with an adaptive Dormer-Prince RK45 solution in terms of methane conversion to within 3 × 10⁻⁷, conserves energy and hydrogen to a better than 0.1% degree, and approaches thermodynamic equilibrium but never surpasses it. The model forecasts a methane conversion of 65.2% and a hydrogen mole fraction of 68.5% at the base case conditions of 900 °C, 1 bar, U₀/U_mf = 3, 2 kg catalyst, and 80% CH₄. The model predicts velocity and catalyst-loading effects that are conservative for design, but surpass the 15% acceptance requirement. It also accurately reproduces calibrated temperature effects within 5% and the direction of all trends versus three literature fluidized-bed datasets. Methane pyrolysis reactors can be physically optimised, surrogate models can be used, and uncertainty can be quantified with this approach
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moses et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: