Power transformer performance is strongly influenced by reactive power (VAR), yet the quantitative link between VAR fluctuation and insulation loss-of-life in heavy industrial systems remains under-documented. This study analyzes that link for six 70 kV power transformers (three at the Tonasa IV and three at the Tonasa V substations, 31.5–40 MVA) in the electrical system of PT Semen Tonasa, combining SCADA operational data, an ETAP load-flow simulation, and an analytical ageing-rate calculation based on IEC 60076-7. Varying reactive power from 1 to 10 MVAR at a fixed active power of 10 MW increased the loading level from 31.41% to 44.19% of the 80% operating limit, consistent with S = √(P²+Q²). SCADA records showed current rising and primary-side voltage falling as VAR increased, with all voltages (66.68–68.95 kV) remaining within ±10% of nominal. For the three Tonasa V units, hotspot temperatures of 65.42–75.23°C and loss-of-life rates of 0.022–0.069 pu/day were obtained, well below the 98°C/V = 1 design reference; Transformer #1 aged roughly 3.1 times faster than Transformer #2, reflecting its higher average loading (63.4% vs. 36.5% of the operating limit). The extrapolated remaining-life figures (79.7–250 years) are indicative rather than literal, given the short (3–5-day) SCADA window; the loss-of-life rate is therefore treated as the primary, more defensible indicator. Reactive-power compensation via capacitor banks or static var compensators is recommended to limit current, hotspot temperature, and insulation ageing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bachtiar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: