PURPOSE: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) provides nonionizing motion monitoring but lacks direct correlation with internal dosimetric changes. Purely data-driven models for surface-to-internal deformation prediction often yield biomechanically implausible results. This study proposes a physics-informed depth-enhanced (PIDE) framework, validated in silico, to reconstruct internal deformation and cumulative dose from noisy surface measurements. METHODS: ) on extracted patient surfaces. To map external surface features to internal deformation vector fields (DVF), we developed a regularized ridge regression model. Unlike traditional models, ours integrates a spectral energy penalty derived from patient-specific CBCT motion priors, constraining predictions to physically plausible deformations. Patient-specific clinical RTDOSE distributions and 348 anatomical landmarks were utilized to evaluate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy. Vector field smoothness was quantified using the Jacobian determinant. RESULTS: Under realistic simulated sensor noise, the PIDE framework achieved an anatomical target registration error (TRE) of 1.33 ± 1.42 mm (compared to an initial misalignment of 2.14 ± 2.38 mm, representing a 37.8% error reduction). The physics-constrained regression yielded an RMSE of 2.31 mm (r = 0.720) for motion prediction and effectively eliminated nonphysical tissue "folding" artifacts (reducing negative Jacobian voxels from 0.54% to 0.10%, p = 0.0209). Dosimetric evaluation using actual patient treatment plans achieved a mean Gamma passing rate (3%/3 mm) of 99.68 ± 0.30% (range: 99.00%-100.00%), with 100% of patients (29/29) exceeding the 90% clinical safety threshold. The end-to-end algorithmic inference latency was 2.71 ms per frame, demonstrating high computational efficiency. CONCLUSION: The integration of geometric surface features with patient-specific physical constraints successfully prevents nonphysiological deformation artifacts caused by sensor noise. This in silico study demonstrates the feasibility and computational efficiency of the PIDE framework for rapid cumulative dose monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: