Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brownian motion and the Brownian bridge have covariance kernels that are Green's functions of the negative second derivative on the unit interval, with mixed Dirichlet-Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions, respectively. We characterize the Green's functions of all strictly positive real self-adjoint realizations of this operator. The kernels are in one-to-one correspondence with positive-semidefinite 2×2 endpoint covariance matrices. We call the associated centered Gaussian processes Brownian processes. Each is a standard Brownian bridge plus the affine interpolation of an independent Gaussian endpoint vector. Singular endpoint covariance matrices give hard endpoint constraints, such as the pinned start $X(0)=0$ of Brownian motion. This parametrization gives explicit operator domains and energy spaces. On every mesh it gives an exact sparse precision matrix, so the likelihood of n observations can be evaluated in $O(n)$ operations. Nonnegative realizations with a null space are treated separately through orthogonally normalized pseudoinverses, which are proper Gaussian covariances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lars Lau Rakêt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: