Low-cost RGB video-based markerless motion capture is attractive for estimating lower-limb biomechanics, but the influence of implementation choices on the resulting kinematic and kinetic estimates remains uncertain. This proof-of-concept study developed a two-camera video-based musculoskeletal multibody dynamics workflow and assessed two pose estimation algorithm, RTMPose-x with the HALPE_26 keypoint convention and OpenPose with the BODY_25 convention, and three camera placement angles (20°, 40°, and 60°). Ten healthy male participants performed walking, running, and squatting while barefoot and wearing minimal clothing. In the video-based workflow, kinetic outputs were computed with ground reaction forces (GRFs) estimated using a foot–ground contact model and subsequently used to calculate joint contact forces (JCFs). A force-plate-informed Vicon-driven musculoskeletal model served as the reference. Relative to OpenPose-BODY_25, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 produced 2.8%–26.4% lower root mean square errors (RMSEs) and 1.0%–46.3% higher Pearson correlation coefficients (ρ) for knee flexion–extension across the three activities, as well as 1.5%–38.2% lower RMSEs and 1.0%–16.4% higher correlations for most JCF outcomes. The 60° configuration showed favorable performance for selected biomechanical outcomes within the tested range. Overall, RTMPose-x–HALPE_26 showed lower numerical errors and/or stronger waveform correlations than OpenPose-BODY_25 for several outcomes, although these differences varied across activities and biomechanical variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: