The rapid expansion of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications increases the demand for reliable low-altitude airspace monitoring. Radio-frequency (RF)-based UAV identification provides a passive and non-visual solution by exploiting transmitter-dependent signal characteristics. In open-world deployments, an RF monitoring system needs to recognize known UAV emitters while rejecting previously unseen RF signals. However, open-world RF monitoring remains challenging because known UAV signals often exhibit substantial intra-class variations, while unseen signals can lie close to known-class distributions. These factors make it difficult to preserve known-class discrimination and reliably reject unknown signals under resource-constrained deployments. To address these limitations, we propose the Dual-Space Calibrated Cross-Attention Network (DSC-CAN), a parameter-efficient framework for open-set RF UAV identification. We first employ a compact local–global cross-attention encoder to coordinate fine-grained RF patterns and long-range contextual dependencies, thereby learning compact and discriminative representations. We then introduce class-adaptive prototype-radius calibration to construct class-specific acceptance regions from known training and calibration data, enabling adaptive boundary estimation without using unknown test samples. Finally, we develop dual-space geometric fusion to combine Euclidean prototype-distance evidence with contrastive cosine evidence, thereby suppressing unreliable acceptance decisions when the two spaces provide inconsistent support for a known class. Experiments on multiple known–unknown class partitions show that DSC-CAN achieves strong and stable open-set performance with only 0.187 M parameters. In the primary scenario, DSC-CAN obtains an H -score of 0.9542, an AUROC of 0.9847, an FPR@95 of 0.0368, and an OSCR of 0.9586. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of the overall design and the complementary roles of its components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: