Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within the Generative Digital Universe Model (GDUM) framework, we investigate the emergence of the vacuum speed of light c and the four laws of thermodynamics from pre-geometric topological axioms. The theory operates under strict ontological separation via the irreversible readout functor ρ: topological objects belong to Layer-1 pre-geometry, while measurable spacetime quantities are emergent Layer-2 representational outputs after projection-readout. We adopt a set of foundational postulates, split into ontological-mathematical axioms and additional model-calibration ansätze. In this framework, c is interpreted both as a definitional unit-conversion coefficient c≡ℓ_P/t_P and as an emergent critical topological velocity within four-dimensional projected spacetime. Photons correspond to the topological ground-state boundary condition W°_K=1, giving v_γ=c. The electron effective projection efficiency is set by model ansatz α = 1/(2πW°_K), yielding v_e/c = 2πα ≈ 0.0458. The numerical self-consistency chain uses the historical ansatz value W°_K ≈ 21.8103; this W°_K is strictly distinct from the pre-geometric winding W_K used in the companion GDUM Discussion manuscript. All four laws of thermodynamics are constructed from the evolution of the topological Hilbert space H_top within the framework: zeroth law from winding-exchange steady states; first law from topological functional conservation; second law from intrinsic topological decoherence for subsystem states; third law from topological constraints forbidding strict T=0. We write a formal unified topological action, noting that fully explicit forms for L_geom, L_exc remain among open research tasks. At the present revision, the work provides internal numerical self-consistency but does not yet supply novel independent experimental predictions beyond reproducing known established physics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao Chenghua (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: