Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) is diagnosed clinically, and inflammatory findings during an attack may resemble those of acute infection. We examined whether serum caspase-1, ASC/PYCARD, and copeptin change within the same child between attack and remission, and whether attack-phase levels differ from those seen in microbiologically confirmed febrile illness. We enrolled 50 children with PFAPA who provided paired attack and remission samples. Thirty-five children with microbiologically confirmed febrile illness and 26 healthy children served as comparison groups. The prespecified primary outcome was the within-child change in caspase-1, estimated on the log scale with a participant-clustered generalized estimating equation. Paired changes in ASC/PYCARD and copeptin were key secondary outcomes. Secondary models compared PFAPA attacks with febrile controls after adjustment for age, sex, fever-to-sampling interval, maximum temperature, and C-reactive protein. Median caspase-1 rose from 1.93 [1.60–2.78] ng/mL in remission to 3.96 [2.89–5.60] ng/mL during attacks (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.86–2.37; P < 0.001). ASC/PYCARD and copeptin also increased (GMRs, 1.98 and 1.75; Holm-adjusted P < 0.001 for both). In adjusted comparisons with febrile controls, the corresponding GMRs were 1.21 (95% CI, 1.02–1.43; nominal P = 0.028), 1.11 (95% CI, 0.95–1.30; P = 0.189), and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89–1.15; P = 0.842). The caspase-1 difference was no longer significant after Holm correction. Caspase-1, ASC/PYCARD, and copeptin followed a clear attack-remission pattern within children with PFAPA, but their acute concentrations overlapped considerably with those measured during confirmed infections. The small residual difference in caspase-1 was secondary and did not withstand correction for multiple testing. These phase-linked changes are biologically descriptive rather than clinically discriminatory; the study did not demonstrate incremental value beyond routine inflammatory testing and does not establish PFAPA-specific inflammasome activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: