Floating knee injuries are high-energy injuries with considerable functional morbidity. In Fraser type I injuries, dual intramedullary nailing permits early stabilization and mobilization. While suprapatellar nailing offers technical advantages for proximal-third tibial fractures, its role within floating knee injuries remains inadequately described. This study evaluated functional recovery following portal-matched tibial nailing in Fraser type I floating knee injuries. A retrospective case series of seven adults with Fraser type I floating knee injuries treated with dual intramedullary nailing between February 2022 and February 2026 was conducted at a tertiary care centre. Five patients with diaphyseal tibial fractures underwent infrapatellar nailing, while two with proximal-third fractures underwent suprapatellar nailing. Functional outcome was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 6 weeks, 6 months and 2 years. Pain, radiological union and complications were also recorded. Outcomes were analysed descriptively given the small and imbalanced subgroups. The COHORT comprised five males and two females, with a mean age of 33.6±7.2 years. Mean IKDC scores improved progressively from 61.54±2.15 to 82.42±2.46 and 86.70±1.30 at 6 weeks, 6 months and 2 years, respectively, in the infrapatellar group. Corresponding scores in the suprapatellar group were 60.30±0.85, 82.85±1.34 and 86.80±0.57. No clinically meaningful difference in functional recovery was observed. No non-union, malunion or implant failure occurred. Portal-matched tibial nailing demonstrated favourable and comparable functional recovery across diaphyseal and proximal-third fractures in Fraser type I floating knee injuries. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: