Two phenothiazine‐bridged 3‐pyrrolyl BODIPY dyads, 1 and 2 , were synthesized through Sonogashira coupling of 3,7‐diethynyl‐ N ‐methylphenothiazine with meso ‐( p ‐iodophenyl) and α ‐bromo 3‐pyrrolyl BODIPY, respectively. Although both molecules contain identical donor and acceptor units, their linkage modes differ: Compound 1 connects through the meso ‐phenyl ring of 3‐pyrrolyl BODIPY unit, whereas compound 2 connects through the α ‐position of the appended pyrrole of 3‐pyrrolyl BODIPY unit. 1D and 2D NMR analyses confirmed that this topological change modifies the donor–acceptor conjugation pathway. Consequently, 2 exhibits strongly redshifted absorption and emission bands relative to 1 (638 vs. 587 nm and 685 vs. 618 nm, respectively), along with a larger Stokes shift. Both dyads show irreversible, oxidation‐dominated electrochemical responses, but 2 oxidizes at a lower potential, consistent with enhanced conjugation. DFT and TD‐DFT calculations attribute these differences to the smaller donor–acceptor dihedral angle and greater HOMO delocalization in 2 . Overall, the NMR, optical, electrochemical, and computational results consistently support a linkage‐site‐dependent structure–property relationship, in which the α‐pyrrolyl connection enhances donor–acceptor communication within these molecular frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondal et al. (2026) studied this question.