Key result
Specific 12-lead ECG criteria differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways.
Why the study?
Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation in WPW syndrome depends on accurate pathway localization, requiring twelve-lead electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways and guide mapping and ablation strategies.
Does 12-lead ECG analysis of delta wave polarity, R/S ratio, and QRS morphology differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=73)
No
Does 12-lead ECG analysis of delta wave polarity, R/S ratio, and QRS morphology differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?
Specific 12-lead ECG criteria—including delta wave polarity in leads II, aVR, and V1, R/S ratio in V1, and QRS notching in lead II—can help differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways prior to catheter ablation.
May aid pre-ablation localization of posteroseptal APs; hypothesis-generating and leaves open prospective validation before guiding strategy.
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is the standard treatment for symptomatic patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Successful RF ablation of an accessory pathway (AP) depends on accurate localization of its site. Methods: This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients who underwent successful RF ablation of a single manifest posteroseptal AP at the Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory of the Cardiovascular Department, Cairo University Hospitals. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were collected and analyzed to identify electrocardiographic criteria that differentiate epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal APs to guide mapping and ablation strategies. Results: Seventy-three patients with a posteroseptal AP were included: 47 were ablated from the right posteroseptal endocardium; 6 from the left posteroseptal endocardium; and 20 were ablated epicardially (from the coronary sinus or its branches). Epicardial posteroseptal APs were predicted by a negative delta wave in lead II, a positive delta wave in lead aVR, a positive delta wave in lead V1, and/or QRS complex notching in lead II. Endocardial posteroseptal APs were predicted by a negative delta wave in lead V1 and/or an R/S ratio less than 1 in lead V1. Double QRS transition was not useful for differentiation unless combined with a Q wave or predominantly negative QRS complex in lead V1. Conclusion: Epicardial and endocardial posteroseptal APs can be differentiated based on delta wave polarity in leads II, aVR, and V1; R/S ratio in lead V1; and QRS complex notching in lead II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with manifest posteroseptal accessory pathway (n=73). 12-lead ECG criteria (delta wave polarity, R/S ratio, QRS notching) in epicardial posteroseptal accessory pathways vs. Endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways was evaluated on Differentiation of epicardial from endocardial posteroseptal accessory pathways. 12-lead ECG criteria differentiated epicardial (n=20) from endocardial (n=53) posteroseptal accessory pathways in 73 patients using delta wave polarity in leads II, aVR, and V1, and V1 R/S ratio <1.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: