Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments require linguistic translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing before use in new populations. Bengali is widely spoken, but a Bengali version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) has not yet undergone adequate psychometric evaluation. This study translated, culturally adapted, and evaluated the preliminary psychometric properties of the Bengali OHIP-14 (OHIP-14bn). A cross-sectional study was conducted among 210 Bengali-speaking adult patients attending a teaching dental hospital. The OHIP-14 was translated using forward translation and blinded back-translation, followed by qualitative expert review. Participants completed the OHIP-14bn including questions on dental pain, dental attendance, and sociodemographic characteristics and underwent clinical oral examination. Item responses were recoded to a 0–4 scale and summed to generate a total score of 0–56. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega total, corrected item-total correlations, and alpha-if-item-deleted analyses. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and ordinal confirmatory factor analysis comparing single-factor, higher-order seven-domain, and correlated seven-domain models. Hypothesis-based construct validity was assessed using known-groups comparisons and clinical correlations. The mean OHIP-14bn total score was 20.63 ± 8.73, and the median was 21.00 (IQR, 15.25–26.00). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.924, McDonald’s omega total was 0.948, and corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.463 to 0.749. Exploratory factor analysis supported a dominant general factor explaining 56.5% of the variance, with loadings of 0.596–0.830. The higher-order seven-domain model demonstrated satisfactory fit (CFI = 0.997, TLI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.058), whereas the single-factor model showed mixed fit and the correlated seven-domain model produced an improper solution. OHIP-14bn scores were higher among participants reporting oral pain, requiring partial dentures, or requiring pulp care. The OHIP-14bn demonstrated strong internal consistency and preliminary evidence of structural and hypothesis-based construct validity in this single-site, treatment-seeking clinical sample. Because the sample was predominantly rural and male and 90.5% required pulp care, generalizability beyond similar Bengali-speaking clinical populations is limited. Broader use requires cognitive debriefing with intended respondents, quantitative content-validity assessment, test–retest reliability, responsiveness testing, and independent confirmation of the factor structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: