. Against the policy background in which expanding consumption has moved from short-term demand management toward the construction of a long-term household-consumption mechanism, existing studies have extensively examined income, wealth, social security, expectations, supply quality, and the consumption environment. Less attention has been paid to a more antecedent question: how consumers acquire the capacity to recognize, understand, participate in, and repeatedly derive utility from differentiated goods and services. This paper introduces demand-side taste capital, a durable stock of category-specific knowledge, appreciation, participation skills, emotional memories, and identity linkages accumulated through family, school, peers, media, and repeated participation. It develops a mechanism linking interest exposure in the formative years to taste-capital accumulation, preferences and willingness to pay after consumers gain greater income and decision autonomy, realized demand, market thickness, and industrial differentiation. The paper further proposes a life-cycle antecedence effect: late childhood through early youth is an important period of concentrated accumulation, while the economic effects of that stock are more fully released after independent income and consumption decision-making emerge, and are reconfigured rather than eliminated in later life. The framework distinguishes demand capacity from purchasing power, intertemporal constraints, supply conditions, and time–space accessibility, and discusses demand-side spillovers of education, intergenerational transmission, and demand-side absorption of new supply. Descriptive evidence from European football, Chinese service consumption, and digital cultural consumption provides real-world support for different links in the proposed mechanism. The paper concludes that a long-run consumption strategy should address not only current purchasing conditions but also the antecedent formation of demand capacity among future consumer cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guoping Hua (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: