This paper introduces “Khanhnions” as proposed terminology for a real 96-dimensional tensor framework combining a two-channel index, a three-dimensional spatial index, and a 16-dimensional sedenion index. The underlying space is defined as K = R² ⊗ R³ ⊗ S, where S is the real sedenion algebra. A Euclidean inner product and a componentwise multiplication are specified explicitly. Under this multiplication, the resulting unital real algebra is isomorphic to the direct product of six sedenion algebras. The paper develops: • A basis and coordinate representation for the 96-dimensional space.• Explicit structure constants using a recursive Cayley–Dickson sign rule and binary exclusive OR.• The block decomposition, conjugation, associator coefficients, and zero-product degeneracies.• A counterexample showing that componentwise multiplication is not equivariant under general spatial rotations.• A rotation-invariant sedenion-valued pairing.• A Gram-matrix formulation of finite unit-sphere packing constraints and reconstruction up to an orthogonal transformation.• A distinction between the real two-channel framework and its complex extension, which has 96 complex dimensions and 192 real dimensions. The construction is presented as a mathematical framework and methodological research note. It does not claim a new proof of the Kepler theorem, a new packing-density bound, or a demonstrated advantage over conventional coordinate, tensor, or Gram-matrix methods. “Khanhnions” is proposed terminology; the underlying tensor construction, direct-product algebra, and elementary propositions are not asserted to be original mathematical results. No comprehensive priority assessment has been completed. Author: Nguyen Kim KhanhProject: Khanh MathematicsDate: 28 October 2026 AI assistance was used in mathematical formulation, organization, translation, and wording. Independent verification of the arguments, references, and relationship to prior work is recommended before publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim Khanh Nguyen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: