Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Early-onset diabetes is increasing in South Asia, but the distribution and correlates of diabetes types among young Pakistani patients are poorly characterized. Methods: This cross-sectional study at five tertiary-care hospitals in Lahore and Kasur, Pakistan, included 856 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes diagnosed at or before 40 years of age, grouped by age at diagnosis (1–10, 11–20, 21–30, and 31–40 years). Factors associated with clinically assigned type 1 diabetes were examined using Firth penalized logistic regression adjusted for age at diagnosis, gender, BMI category, first-degree family history, parental consanguinity, and physical activity. Results: Type 1 diabetes was assigned to 255 participants (29.8%), including 97.6% and 73.6% of those diagnosed at 1–10 and 11–20 years, compared with 21.9% and 10.4% of those diagnosed at 21–30 and 31–40 years. BMI and blood pressure were higher with later diagnosis, whereas glycemic control was uniformly poor (mean HbA1c, 9.1%; p = 0.356). Compared with diagnosis at 1–10 years, the adjusted odds of type 1 diabetes were lower with diagnosis at 11–20 years (aOR, 0.0767; 95% CI, 0.0083–0.3134), 21–30 years (aOR, 0.0083; 95% CI, 0.0009–0.0335), and 31–40 years (aOR, 0.0034; 95% CI, 0.0004–0.0144) and in females (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24–0.51), and higher with parental consanguinity (aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.36–2.91) and underweight BMI (aOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.04–3.70). First-degree family history (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61–1.48) and physical activity (aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.92–1.98) were not associated with diabetes type. The optimism-corrected area under the curve was 0.846. Conclusions: Clinically assigned diabetes type differed sharply by age at diagnosis and was independently associated with gender, parental consanguinity, and underweight BMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khurram et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: