Objective: This study aimed to translate the English version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro (CPOT-Neuro) to a simplified Thai version (Th-CPOT-Neuro) and to validate and investigate the reliability of the Thai version. Material and Methods: The primary English version of the CPOT-Neuro proposed by Gélinas was used for reference. The Th-CPOT-Neuro was developed using forward translation and back translation methods proposed by the World Health Organization. Content validity of the Th-CPOT-Neuro was established using the content validity index (CVI) as appraised by three specialists. Discriminative validation of the Th-CPOT-Neuro was evaluated during painful and non-painful routine procedures. The Kappa coefficient was used to test the inter-rater reliability of the Th-CPOT-Neuro. Results: The scale-level CVI (S-CVI) of the Thai version of the CPOT-Neuro was 0.82, which is above the lower limit of acceptability for the S-CVI (0.80). Inter-rater reliability of the Th-CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients >0.86. Discriminative validation of the Th-CPOT-Neuro was supported with higher scores during painful procedures compared to baseline at rest, both before and at the peak opioid analgesic effect (p-value<0.01). Conclusion: The Th-CPOT-Neuro has good psychometric properties to assess pain in Thai neurosurgical patients unable to self-report. Implementation of the Th-CPOT-Neuro to assess pain in the local Thai context is therefore recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilalee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: