Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a Bayesian bootstrap method for election forecasting that integrates traditional own-intention questions with wisdom-of-crowds questions, which ask for social-circle expectations and election forecasts. Across the 2018, 2020, and 2024 U.S. elections, wisdom-of-crowds questions consistently outperformed own-intention questions in predicting vote shares. The Bayesian bootstrap combines these questions in a theoretically justified way, assigning weights based on their inferred informational value. The main assumption is that election winner expectations for a given participant are themselves an optimal Bayesian forecast in light of all evidence available to that participant. Social-circle expectations contribute the most to the Bayesian bootstrap forecast, as they reduce demographic biases and capture hidden voter preferences. The method improves forecast accuracy across diverse electoral contexts, offering a principled approach to combining polling questions and suggesting applicability to forecasting other social phenomena.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: