Aim and Objectives: Catatonia is a transdiagnostic neuropsychiatric syndrome carrying substantial morbidity when unrecognised, and prospective data from Northern India are limited. This study characterised its phenomenology, diagnostic associations, treatment response and short-term outcome.Materials and Methods: Consecutive adult inpatients meeting DSM-5 criteria for catatonia with a positive Bush–Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument were enrolled prospectively and rated on the 23-item Bush–Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS); diagnoses were established using MINI 7.0.2. Secondary causes were assessed by neurological examination and a protocolised investigation panel. Patients received a lorazepam challenge; modified electroconvulsive therapy (m-ECT) followed partial response or recurrence during tapering. Resolution was defined as a negative screen with BFCRS ≤2 sustained 48 hours.Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled (56.5% male; 56.5% aged 18–30 years). Bipolar disorder was commonest (33, 71.7%), then schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (5, 10.9% each). Mean baseline BFCRS total was 14.00 ± 4.12. Retarded signs predominated: mutism, posturing, rigidity, negativism and withdrawal each occurred in 100%. The lorazepam challenge was positive in 42 of 46 (91.3%), yet only 9 of these (21.4%) resolved without m-ECT; 36 of 46 (78.3%) required it. Catatonia resolved in 44 of 46 (95.7%) before discharge. At four weeks, 30 of 40 patients remained in remission.Conclusion: Catatonia was most often associated with bipolar disorder and presented predominantly with retarded signs. Although the lorazepam challenge was positive in over nine of ten patients, most still required m-ECT, indicating that challenge responsiveness did not predict sustained remission on lorazepam alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: