This work presents a metrologically grounded approach for quantitative photovoltaic (PV) module temperature measurement using spectral-directional infrared thermography. The proposed measurement chain combines experimental estimation of the reflected sky contribution, spectral-directional radiometric modeling, instrument calibration, and uncertainty propagation according to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) framework. Outdoor experiments were conducted under clear-sky, partially cloudy, and cloudy conditions. The spectral-directional model was compared with conventional diffuse-gray thermographic processing and calibrated contact measurements. For the analyzed campaigns, the spectral-directional approach produced absolute deviations from the contact reference ranging from 0.14 ∘ C to 4.16 ∘ C, whereas the diffuse-gray model produced deviations from 0.58 ∘ C to 6.41 ∘ C. The results demonstrate that explicit consideration of reflected sky radiance and the spectral-directional behavior of PV glass improves the physical representativeness of thermographic temperature estimates. Despite the remaining limitations associated with optical-property characterization and sky-radiance estimation, the proposed methodology provides physically consistent and traceable temperature measurements while preserving the original thermal state of the module, supporting the use of infrared thermography as a quantitative tool for photovoltaic temperature assessment under real outdoor operating conditions. • A metrologically grounded approach for quantitative PV thermography is presented. • Reflected sky radiance is experimentally determined under outdoor conditions. • Spectral-directional modeling reduced deviations relative to contact measurements. • Expanded uncertainties between 1.3 ∘ C and 1.8 ∘ C were achieved outdoors. • Contact sensors can alter the thermal state of PV modules through shading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bossaert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: