Domain randomization (DR) is the standard remedy for the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement-learned locomotion, yet existing DR sensitivity studies are confined to high-precision platforms whose near-ideal actuators sideline actuator error. On low-cost hardware, actuator and contact modeling error plausibly dominate the transfer gap, but no systematic method characterizes this regime. We present a framework and experimental protocol for DR sensitivity analysis targeting low-cost actuator platforms, comprising: (i) a one-at-a-time ablation protocol that ranks randomized parameters by their marginal effect on transferred gait performance; (ii) an extension of legged_gym adding actuator-parameter randomization (PD gains and torque limit), absent from the public codebase; and (iii) three evaluation metrics with a hardware validation protocol. We instantiate the framework on a six-joint MI-motor biped with a JY901 IMU, specify randomization ranges from measured hardware parameters, and hypothesize that non-rigid-body parameters (contact friction, PD stiffness) dominate rigid-body parameters (CoM offset, inertia, mass). The protocol designed to test this hypothesis is detailed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: