Students’ evaluations of AI-assisted learning may share a broader common appraisal. This study evaluates whether AI-assisted learning appraisal can be represented as a higher-order construct reflected by trust in AI, perceived usefulness, continued-use orientation, and perceived learning benefits, and examines its association with self-reported AI literacy. A total of 519 consenting survey responses were collected through classroom convenience sampling at a single Vietnamese university and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The findings provide qualified support for the higher-order representation, although substantial overlap limits the empirical distinctiveness of its first-order dimensions. AI literacy was positively associated with appraisal across response-quality samples and estimation methods, although the standardized coefficient declined from 0.867 in the full sample to 0.723 after stricter response-quality screening. The higher-order construct offers a parsimonious summary of learning-related evaluations, but its distinctiveness from general AI favorability remains untested. The cross-sectional convenience design and unverified uniqueness of respondents across the two collection periods limit causal interpretation and generalizability, and leave response independence uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen Thi Kieu An (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: