It is clear that Aristotle is committed to some sort of efficient-causal like-causes-like principle, what is commonly referred to as Aristotle’s Principle of Causal Synonymy. It is less clear what sort of principle this is: should we think of it more like a metaphysical law or more like an empirical generalization? I argue for the former, or high status, view of the principle against the latter, or low status, view. I do this by breaking down what I call high and low status into three axes and arguing that the textual evidence supports high status along all three axes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landon Hobbs (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: