Epidemic forecasting across heterogeneous regions faces significant challenges due to domain shifts in healthcare infrastructure, population demographics, and intervention policies. We present SEIR-N-BEATS, a hybrid transfer learning framework integrating epidemiological theory with neural pattern recognition for robust cross-domain prediction. Our approach combines a modified susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed (SEIR) model with neural basis expansion analysis for time series (N-BEATS) to address domain adaptation challenges. The SEIR component incorporates time-varying transmission rates and policy-aware mechanisms to capture distributional shifts, while N-BEATS learns domain-specific residual patterns through hierarchical blocks with interpretable decomposition. We evaluated cross-domain generalization using epidemic surveillance data from multiple regions with varying healthcare systems (December 2019–May 2022), comparing performance via MAE, RMSE, MAPE, and Pearson correlation under both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios. SEIR-N-BEATS achieved 1.03% MAPE with 19.1% error reduction compared to mechanistic SEIR baselines, demonstrating superior transfer capability across heterogeneous domains (MAE range 1.32–576.39). The framework exhibited exceptional out-of-distribution robustness, maintaining near-zero MAPE variation ( 0.00% ± 0.01% 0.00 % ± 0.01 % ) under noise perturbations, compared to substantial MAPE degradation in pure machine-learning baselines (LSTM 39.13% ± 2.8% 39.13 % ± 2.8 % , N-BEATS 243.23% ± 15.2% 243.23 % ± 15.2 % ). Cross-regional validation confirmed effective domain adaptation with 23.4% average MAE improvement. This framework bridges epidemiological knowledge with data-driven learning, enabling interpretable cross-domain forecasting robust to distribution shifts, offering practical solutions for resource allocation and intervention planning across diverse healthcare settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: