Objective: The study aimed to analyse Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques for clinical decision support, diagnostic analysis and predictive analytics for better implementation in healthcare. Design: The study adopted a systematic literature review guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify 17 studies related to three domains: clinical decision support, diagnostic analysis and predictive analytics. Thematic analysis was conducted to propose a conceptual model, the Domain-Contingent AI Implementation Model in Healthcare, to suggest that AI effectiveness relies on the domain-specific drivers, constraints, and system-level enablers. Main outcome measures: The study evaluates AI implementation against the drivers and constraints of three domains, derived through thematic analysis in healthcare settings. Results: Findings emphasised the nature of AI as a domain-contingent capability across the three healthcare domains. AI effectiveness in healthcare is driven by interpretability, data intensity and forecasting power, while it is constrained by trust, black-box models and a validation gap in clinical decision support, diagnostic analysis and predictive analytics, respectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that AI’s effectiveness in healthcare implementation is driven by adaptation factors, including usability, infrastructure, and reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasudevan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: