Key result
Lower LVEF reserve on stress PET linked to ~38% higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
Left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R) is a marker for high-risk coronary artery disease on PET myocardial perfusion imaging, but its prognostic and diagnostic significance in large real-world populations remains incompletely defined.
Does impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R) predict all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and high-risk obstructive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing gated rest and vasodilator stress PET myocardial perfusion imaging?
Cohort (n=34,976)
Yes
Does impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R) predict all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and high-risk obstructive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing gated rest and vasodilator stress PET myocardial perfusion imaging?
In a large multicenter PET registry, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R) demonstrated a graded, independent association with increased mortality and identified patients with a higher likelihood of left-main or 3-vessel coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R), defined as stress EF minus rest EF, is a marker for high-risk coronary artery disease in patients undergoing positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging, but its prognostic and diagnostic significance in large real-world populations remains incompletely defined. We aimed to analyze the association of LVEF-R with mortality and high-risk obstructive coronary artery disease in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS: We analyzed 34 976 patients from 13 sites who underwent gated rest and vasodilator stress positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging from the Registry of Flow and Perfusion Imaging for Artificial Intelligence with PET. Associations between LVEF-R and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death were assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. In a subset with invasive coronary angiography (n=6843), the relationship between LVEF-R and angiographic disease was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 9392 (26.9%) patients had an LVEF-R<0%. Over a median follow-up of 4.1 years, lower LVEF-R demonstrated a graded association with higher mortality. Compared with LVEF-R>5%, adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.20 for LVEF-R 0% to 5% ([95% CI, 1.13–1.28]; P <0.001), 1.32 for −5% to 0% ([95% CI, 1.23–1.42]; P <0.001), and 1.38 for ≤−5% ([95% CI, 1.24–1.52]; P <0.001). A negative LVEF-R was also associated with high-risk coronary artery disease, including left main and 3-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: LVEF-R is an independent predictor of mortality, with a graded association between impaired reserve and adverse outcomes. A negative LVEF-R identifies patients with a higher likelihood of multivessel or left-main coronary artery disease, supporting its role as a clinically relevant marker of high-risk disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hijazi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected or known coronary artery disease undergoing PET myocardial perfusion imaging (n=34,976). Impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve (LVEF-R ≤-5%) vs. LVEF-R >5% was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.24-1.52, p=<0.001). Lower LVEF reserve (≤-5% vs >5%) on vasodilator stress PET was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.24-1.52; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: