Coordinating multiple recommendation objectives (e.g., click and conversion) is critical for real-world generative recommendation (GR). However, since a positive item in GR can be retrieved only when its tokens are successively selected at every decoding step, traditional item-wise methods lack fine-grained token-wise supervision to guide intermediate steps. Motivated by its success in foundation models, we consider introducing multi-objective on-policy distillation (MOPD) into GR to distill two single-objective teachers into a student at each token. Yet, we find that in vanilla MOPD, (i) teachers exhibit unequal distillation difficulty at each token (i.e., token-level imbalance), and (ii) the harder-to-distill teacher varies across tokens (i.e., cross-token inconsistency), leaving each objective poorly learned at certain steps and hindering positive item retrieval for both objectives, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this challenge, we propose KL-MOPD (KL-Weighted Multi-Objective On-Policy Distillation), a simple yet effective distillation method that allocates token-wise teacher weights proportional to the initial student-teacher token-wise KL divergences, thereby strengthening supervision for the harder-to-distill teacher at every decoding step. Despite its simplicity, we theoretically prove that KL-MOPD strictly outperforms vanilla MOPD in the additive joint recommendation objective under mild conditions. Moreover, KL-MOPD is plug-and-play and computationally efficient, requiring only a one-time pre-training weight calibration with negligible training overhead. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks, a billion-scale industrial dataset, and online A/B tests on our e-commerce advertising platform demonstrate that KL-MOPD significantly improves both individual and joint recommendation performance. The anonymous code is provided for peer review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: