This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: In Asia/Pacific, 24% of men 18-49 years report perpetrating rape. Longitudinal research on sexually violent behavior (SVB) is limited. We assessed risk/protective factors for SVB in a cohort of young men across Vietnam. Methods: 2444 male students attending six Vietnamese universities in 2024 participated in two pre-intervention waves of SCALE, an implementation trial of the GlobalConsent sexual-violence-prevention program. Marginal models with a logit link assessed wave-one risk/protective factors for six-month wave-two SVB. Predicted probabilities were derived for significant factors. Results: Six-month SVB prevalence was 15.5% (wave one) and 15.2% (wave two). Factors associated with wave-two SVB were: depressive symptoms moderate or higher (adjusted odds ratio aOR = 1.70), sexual consent knowledge (aOR = 0.44), prior-to-18 sexually explicit material (SEM) use (aORs = 1.92 non-physically-violent SEM, 6.29 physically-violent SEM once, 7.51 violent SEM more than once), 3-4 childhood-family-dysfunction types (aOR = 4.87), 4-6 child-maltreatment types (aOR = 1.90), and wave-one SVB (aORs = 2.23 non-contact, 4.57 contact). The predicted probability of wave-two SVB was 92.33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.58%, 97.07%) for higher-risk/lower-protection students and 0.69% (95%CI 0.07%, 1.32%) for lower-risk/higher-protection students on significant wave-one factors. Conclusions: Efficacious universal sexual-violence prevention programming and risk-reducing psychosocial support in higher-risk/less-protected men may promote healthy sexual behavior among male undergraduates across Vietnam.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yount et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: