Key result
Structured educational program improves critical care nurses' MI clinical practice scores by ~32 points.
Why the study?
Myocardial infarction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, where critical care nurses play a key role in early recognition and management. This study evaluated the effect of an educational program on nurses' knowledge and practice regarding MI management at Al-Thawra Hospital in Sana'a, Yemen.
Does a structured educational program improve knowledge and clinical practice scores regarding myocardial infarction management in critical care nurses?
Does a structured educational program improve knowledge and clinical practice scores regarding myocardial infarction management in critical care nurses?
A structured educational program was associated with significant short-term improvements in critical care nurses' knowledge and observed clinical practice regarding myocardial infarction management in a resource-limited setting.
Structured education was associated with higher MI knowledge and practice scores; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change training standards.
Background Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Nurses in critical care settings play a key role in the early recognition and management of MI. This study evaluated effect of an educational program on nurses’ knowledge and practice regarding MI management at Al-Thawra Hospital, Sana’a, Yemen. Methods A pre-experimental, one-group pretest–posttest design was employed. Census sampling was used to invite all eligible nurses working in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (ERICU) and Medical Coronary Care Unit (MCCU). Of 54 nurses initially identified, six participated in the pilot study and one did not meet the eligibility criteria; therefore, 47 nurses were included in the main study. Data were collected using a structured knowledge questionnaire and an observational clinical practice checklist. Pretest and posttest scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while Bowker’s test of symmetry assessed changes in categorical knowledge and clinical practice levels. Results Significant improvements were observed in all assessed outcomes. The median general knowledge score increased from 39 to 48 (Z = − 5.674, p < 0.001, r = 0.83), and the median specific MI knowledge score increased from 33 to 42 (Z = − 5.257, p < 0.001, r = 0.77). Significant changes were observed in general and specific knowledge levels (χ² = 25.108 and 20.063, respectively; both p < 0.001). At posttest, 39 nurses had high general knowledge and 33 had high specific knowledge. The median clinical practice score increased from 139 to 171 (Z = − 5.969, p < 0.001, r = 0.87), with a significant change in clinical practice levels (χ² = 30.000, p < 0.001). Conclusion The educational program was associated with significant improvements in nurses’ knowledge and clinical practice regarding MI management. Regular continuing education supported by standardized, evidence-based protocols may strengthen nurses’ competencies in critical care. Further controlled or randomized studies with larger and more diverse samples are needed to assess the sustainability of these improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Haidari et al. (2026) studied Myocardial infarction management (nursing knowledge and clinical practice) (n=47). Structured educational program on myocardial infarction management vs. Pre-intervention baseline (one-group pretest-posttest) was evaluated on Observed clinical practice score regarding myocardial infarction management (median score out of 232) (r = 0.87 (Z = -5.969), p=<0.001). A structured educational program significantly increased critical care nurses' median MI clinical practice score from 139 to 171 (p < 0.001, r = 0.87) and general knowledge from 39 to 48 (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: