Electric vehicle (EV) public charging infrastructure planning faces significant challenges in competitive markets, where multiple service providers affect congestion and user behaviour. This work extends existing modelling frameworks by incorporating the presence of competitors’ stations and more realistic queueing systems. First, we analyse three finite queueing systems, M/M/1/K,M/M/s/K, and M/Er/s/K, with varying numbers of servers (charging outlets) and service time distributions, deriving analytic expressions for user behaviour metrics. Second, we embed the queueing-based user behaviour model into a bilevel program, where the upper level locates new charging stations to maximise accessibility (throughput), and the lower level captures users’ station choices via a user equilibrium. Third, we apply a reformulation from competitive congested user-choice facility location models to approximately solve the bilevel problem and introduce a surrogate-based heuristic to enhance scalability. Fourth, we showcase our methodology on a real-world case study of an urban area in Montreal (Canada), offering managerial insights into how user-choice behaviour assumptions and competition affect throughput and location decisions. The results demonstrate that our model yields (re)location strategies that outperform the existing network. More broadly, this approach provides a tool for incorporating charging service quality—through queueing metrics—and existing competition into station planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugishita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: