Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This descriptive survey study examined the relationship between academic year and social anxiety among nursing students and investigated the mediating effect of ego-resilience.Participants were 310 nursing students from four universities located in G Metropolitan City and J Province, South Korea, and data were collected using structured questionnaires.Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson's correlation analysis, and PROCESS macro Model 4. The significance of indirect effects was tested using 5,000 bootstrap resamples.Mean scores for social anxiety and ego-resilience were 3.01±0.65and 3.72±0.48,respectively, and academic year did not significantly differ for either variable.Social anxiety was significantly negatively correlated with ego-resilience (r =-.450, p < .001).In the multicategorical mediation analysis using second-year students as the reference group, third-year students had significantly lower ego-resilience than secondyear students (B=-.179,p=.016), and ego-resilience was significantly negatively associated with social anxiety (B=-.623,p<.001).The relative indirect effect of being a third-year student versus a secondyear student on social anxiety through ego-resilience was significant (B=.111, 95% CI [.019, .202]).In contrast, the relative direct and total effects were not significant.The relative indirect effects for firstand fourth-year students compared with second-year students were also not significant.These findings suggest that, in understanding social anxiety among nursing students, individual internal adaptive resources such as ego-resilience should be considered in addition to differences in academic year.However, because these findings were based on an exploratory analysis of specific contrasts between academic years, further in-depth and replication studies are needed to clarify the relationships between academic year, social anxiety, and ego-resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: