Camellia oleifera is a major woody oil crop widely cultivated in the hilly and mountainous regions of China, where complex canopy architecture, severe branch and leaf occlusion, uneven illumination, and difficult terrain make harvesting labor-intensive. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer opportunities to improve visual perception, environmental understanding, and robotic decision-making in mechanized harvesting. This review focuses on the application of AI to mechanized Camellia oleifera harvesting across three major harvesting paradigms: branch-oriented vibration harvesting, canopy-oriented contact harvesting, and fruit-oriented selective picking. It examines fruit detection, segmentation and three-dimensional localization, branch and canopy perception, vibration point prediction, natural frequency identification, harvesting parameter optimization, harvestability assessment, and robotic path planning. Representative studies on other fruit crops are reviewed to identify transferable technical frameworks and common challenges in unstructured orchard environments. Although these harvesting paradigms differ in their interaction targets and operational mechanisms, they share enabling technologies such as multimodal perception, point cloud processing, three-dimensional sensing, and intelligent decision-making, creating opportunities for future cross-paradigm integration. Major challenges include severe occlusion, limited high-quality datasets, constrained edge-computing capability, and the gap between visual perception and physical harvesting execution. Future priorities include domain-specific foundation models, physics-informed perception and decision-making, edge intelligence, efficient multimodal sensing, and standardized datasets and system-level evaluation frameworks. This review provides a task-oriented evidence map for developing efficient and field-ready intelligent Camellia oleifera harvesting systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: