AIM: Physical properties refer to a material's observable properties, and mechanical properties relate to a material's response to external forces. This scoping review aims to collate and synthesize the evidence concerning the physical and mechanical properties of clear plastic retainers (CPRs). METHODS: Six databases and a grey literature source were searched with key terms regarding CPRs and their physical and mechanical properties. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The findings were categorized into seven sections by mechanical and/or physical property. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1086 studies with forty-three satisfying selection criteria. Five related to three-dimensional (3D)-printed CPRs. The remainder concerned 'traditionally' fabricated, thermoplastic CPRs (T-CPRs). Nine thermoplastic materials and three 3D-printed materials were evaluated with a total of 36 commercial brands being investigated. 3D-CPRs generally displayed inferior optical and mechanical properties compared to T-CPRs although post-processing generally appeared to enhance relevant properties. Curry and coffee were frequently associated with staining. Cleaning agents containing sodium hypochlorite and tooth-whitening agents containing peroxides appeared to negatively affect surface roughness and mechanical properties. CONCLUSION: 3D-CPRs displayed inferior optical and mechanical properties compared to T-CPRs. Patients should be advised to avoid using bleach-containing agents to clean their CPRs and avoid using their CPRs as receptacles for tooth-whitening materials. They should be made aware of the staining-potential of coffee and curry on the appliance. Further relevant clinical research over the long term is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: