OBJECTIVE: Malpractice pressure in obstetrics contributes to clinician burnout, defensive practice, and declining participation in high-risk maternity care. Taiwan's Childbirth Accident Emergency Relief Act (CAERA) integrates a national no-fault compensation system with mandated caring services, including early communication, emotional support, and administrative assistance after childbirth-related adverse events. This study is to evaluate the timeliness, content, and perceived effectiveness of caring services under CAERA and their association with patient satisfaction and physician-patient relationships. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed nationwide survey data from compensated families and medical institutions following childbirth-related adverse events. Perceptions of caring service timing and content were compared between patients and providers. Associations between service timeliness and satisfaction outcomes were examined using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 1345 family and 1074 institutional responses were analyzed. Substantial perception gaps were identified. Only 38.6% of families reported receiving caring services within 2 days, compared with 82.4% of institutions. Families also reported lower rates of communication (44.0% vs 81.4%), procedural assistance (69.7% vs 93.6%), and emotional support (62.2% vs 95.0%) than providers reported delivering (all P < 0.05). Timeliness was strongly associated with outcomes: families contacted within 2 days reported significantly higher satisfaction with the compensation process, administrative procedures, and physician-patient relationships than those contacted later (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Substantial gaps exist between provider-reported and patient-perceived caring services. Early engagement is associated with higher satisfaction and stronger physician-patient relationships. These findings suggest that the success of no-fault systems depends not only on financial compensation but also on prompt caring services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: