The gold standard for estimating jump height and peak power in the countermovement jump (CMJ) relies on force plates measuring the vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), a waveform that captures movement strategy. However, this equipment is impractical in the field. Instead, this study reconstructs vGRF waveforms from one lower-back accelerometer using a dual functional principal component analysis (FPCA) representation. Four representations (raw, smoothed, B-spline, FPC) were mapped to the vGRF with an MLP, and the raw and smoothed signals also with a transformer, across 663 jumps from 67 participants. The FPC-based MLP reconstructed the waveform with R2 of 0.96 and 0.98, respectively, with and without arm swing. The features a practitioner reads from the curve survived the reconstruction: countermovement depth to R2 = 0.91, peak force to 0.87, the braking-to-propulsion transition force to 0.91 and the propulsive impulse to 0.82. Deriving performance metrics from the reconstructed vGRF tested fidelity more stringently than R2 alone. Jump-height and peak-power errors were 4.0 cm and 3.7 W·kg−1, rising to 6.1 cm and 5.6 W·kg−1, indicating the reconstructed waveform can serve as a reasonable facsimile. The lower-dimensional FPC mappings reduced the model from 128K to around 4K parameters, while improving accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark White (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: