Introduction Mortality rates vary among people with functional seizures (FSs), whether they have comorbid epilepsy or not, potentially owing to higher rates of associated psychiatric comorbidities and deliberate self-harm. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed studies to derive mortality and suicidality prevalence in people with FS. Methods We deposited our protocol with PROSPERO. We performed a systematic review of the literature across 12 databases, including all studies reporting on mortality, suicidality and deliberate self-harm in people with FS. Meta-analysis was used to define the pooled prevalence of the outcomes, ORs and 95% CIs. The sensitivity analysis included group comparison and meta-regression. Results We included 80 studies, of which 65 were eligible for quantitative synthesis (subjects=9650). The pooled prevalence of previous suicide attempts was 23% (95% CI 19% to 27%), with lower suicide attempt rates in the Eastern Mediterranean and Western Pacific regions compared with Africa, the Americas and Europe (p value for subgroup differences <0.001). The pooled prevalence of reported suicidal ideation was 26% (95% CI 16% to 36%) and for self-harm was 22% (95% CI 16% to 30%). Compared with people with only epileptic seizures, people with only FS disclosed more suicide attempts (OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.81 to 5.19) and higher rates of suicidal ideation (OR=1.85, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.07). Females reported more past suicide attempts than males (OR=2.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.73). Conclusions Around one-quarter of people with FS report previous suicide attempts, current suicidal thoughts and/or deliberate self-harmful behaviour, in addition to greater risks of suicide-related death. Screening strategies and targeted psychotherapeutic interventions are needed globally with appropriate cultural contextualisation. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022353999.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hallab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: