The extent to which different 16 S rRNA variable regions yield vaginal microbiota profiles consistent with those obtained from full-length sequences during pregnancy remains unclear. Using full-length 16 S rRNA sequencing data from a Chinese pregnancy cohort, we extracted in silico ten commonly used sub-regions (V1-V2, V1-V3, V3, V4, V3-V4, V3-V5, V4-V5, V4-V6, V6-V8, and V6-V9) and compared them with V1-V9 (internal benchmark). The region-comparison analysis was conducted in a randomly selected sub-cohort of 104 pregnant women, and a secondary case-cohort analysis of 176 women examined whether region choice changed microbiota associations with preterm birth (PTB). Sub-regions differed from V1-V9 across alpha diversity, beta diversity, community state types, taxonomic assignment, species co-occurrence, and predicted functional profiles. V6-V9 best approximated V1-V9 for richness metrics, whereas V1-V3 was most consistent for evenness metrics and Bray-Curtis structure. V6-V8 and V6-V9 performed best for weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances, respectively, and V6-V9 showed the highest concordance for predicted pathway profiles. V1-V3 showed high agreement for major community state types and vaginal types. In the secondary PTB analysis, S_Dialister micraerophilus was associated with PTB in full-length V1-V9, with the direction of the association consistent across subregions. These findings indicate that no single short region exhibits the highest consistency with the full-length sequence in all respects. Region selection should therefore be aligned with the intended analytical endpoint in vaginal microbiota studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: