Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for selected patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, yet organ scarcity exposes candidates to substantial mortality and clinical deterioration while awaiting transplantation.The waiting period should therefore be regarded as a dynamic phase in which disease severity, transplantability, and potentially modifiable risk factors require repeated assessment.This narrative review examines waitlist outcomes and contemporary allocation models, including the model for end-stage liver disease, model for endstage liver disease-sodium, model for end-stage liver disease 3.0, and the genderequity model for liver allocation.It also discusses waitlist-specific management of portal vein thrombosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as the potential role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement as a bridge to transplantation.Particular attention is given to malnutrition, sarcopenia, frailty, and multimodal prehabilitation, which are incompletely captured by conventional allocation scores but strongly influence waitlist and post-transplant outcomes.Current evidence supports individualized, multidisciplinary follow-up aimed not only at updating allocation priority but also at preserving transplantability.Future studies should define risk-adapted surveillance schedules and determine whether targeted interventions improve survival, reduce delisting, and enhance recovery after transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: