Marine diesel engines are major contributors to atmospheric pollution, emitting SO 2 , CO 2 , NO x , and CO in quantities subject to increasingly stringent International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations.Wet scrubbers are a cost-effective exhaust gas cleaning option, yet most existing systems employ either immersion (dipping) or spray (shower) gas-liquid contact in isolation, and experimental data on a structurally combined dipping-shower contact pattern under marine diesel conditions remain scarce.In this study, the term "hybrid" denotes this structural combination of bubble-immersion and spray contact, not the open-loop/closed-loop switching systems commonly called hybrid scrubbers in shipping.A prototype hybrid wet scrubber was fabricated from recycled industrial oilstorage drums and tested on a Dongfeng diesel engine at four engine-speed settings (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of rated speed).Concentrations of CO 2 , SO 2 , NO 2 , and CO were measured at the scrubber inlet and outlet with an Internet of Things (IoT)-based multi-gas sensor node under three configurations: dipping-only, shower-only, and hybrid (dipping + shower), with five consecutive sensor readings per condition, and removal efficiency (η) was reported as mean ± standard deviation.Averaged over the four engine speeds, the hybrid configuration gave the highest removal of all four gases, with mean gains of about 6 and 10 percentage points for SO 2 and about 3 and 10 percentage points for CO relative to dipping-only and shower-only operation, respectively; it was not superior at every individual condition (e.g., CO at 100% and CO 2 at 75% of rated speed).SO 2 achieved the highest removal (75-79% in hybrid mode, coefficient of variation below 7%), and CO peaked at 78% at 25% rated speed, declining at higher speeds because of reduced gas-liquid contact time.By contrast, CO 2 removal remained inherently limited (8-11%) owing to its low aqueous solubility, and NO 2 removal was below 10%, reflecting the poor water solubility of NO that dominates NO x .The overall efficiency trend was SO 2 > CO > CO 2 > NO 2 .These results indicate that the hybrid dipping-shower scrubber is best regarded as a low-cost, transitional emission-control device suited mainly to SO 2 and partial CO abatement; it cannot meet deep CO 2 capture or stringent NO x -control requirements without alkaline absorbents, oxidants, or multi-stage treatment.Future work should address chemically enhanced scrubbing liquids, repeated long-duration testing, and characterization of the wash water to manage the risk of transferring pollution from air to water.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: