Burnout, compassion fatigue, secondary traumatic stress, and attrition represent significant and growing challenges in applied behavior analysis. These challenges all collectively impact practitioner well-being, yet strategies to support such well-being initiatives have received limited systematic attention in the behavior-analytic literature. In this discussion, I posit that the concept of self-compassion represents an important gap in supporting practitioner well-being. Self-compassion, as defined by Neff, includes three interrelated components: (1) responding to personal suffering with kindness rather than self-judgment, (2) recognizing struggle as part of the shared human condition, and (3) maintaining balanced awareness of difficult emotions. Across health, education, and psychology fields, self-compassion has demonstrated strong empirical support as a protective factor against burnout, emotional exhaustion, anxiety, experiential avoidance, and compassion fatigue. Drawing on Neff’s model and translating its components into behavior-analytic terms grounded in radical behaviorism, relational frame theory, and acceptance and commitment training, in this article, I describe a conceptual foundation for self-compassion within applied behavior analysis, propose a four-component training framework, and offer directions for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reva Mathieu-Sher (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: