Background: Adolescents may perceive social media as a source of learning and social support while also reporting unfavourable emotional experiences. Locally grounded descriptive evidence can inform research questions without establishing the psychological effects of social media. Objective: To describe favourable and unfavourable social-media-related experiences reported by higher-secondary students in Guwahati, Assam. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey involved a purposively selected group of 90 students aged 16–19 years. An 18-item, researcher-developed yes/no questionnaire, reviewed for relevance and clarity by two subject experts, recorded account access, use patterns and perceived experiences. Eighty-four students who reported having a social-media account contributed responses to the subsequent items; the analysis used counts and percentages. Results: Of 90 students, 84 (93.3%) reported social-media account access. Among the 84 account holders, 46 (54.8%) reported more than three hours of daily use. Favourable responses included productive use (88.1%), self-expression (76.2%), perceived mental-health awareness (77.4%) and belonging (58.3%). Unfavourable responses included moodiness after use (57.1%), sensitivity to likes or comments (45.2%), loneliness (44.0%), reduced confidence (41.7%) and perceived distance from family or friends (38.1%). Conclusion: Respondents reported a mixture of favourable and unfavourable experiences. These item-level responses do not establish causality, clinical diagnoses or population prevalence. Larger studies with clearer sampling procedures and validated measures are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: