Purpose: To examine associations of workplace gaslighting with job satisfaction and self-rated performance among hospital nurses. Design/methodology/approach: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 448 hospital nurses in Greece between October and December 2025. Workplace gaslighting was assessed with the 11-item Gaslighting at Work Scale. Job satisfaction and self-rated performance were assessed using global single-item measures. Pearson correlations and linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, postgraduate education, work experience, shift work, and perceived understaffing were used. Findings: Higher workplace gaslighting was associated with lower job satisfaction (r = −0.339, p < .001) and lower self-rated performance (r = −0.153, p = .001). After adjustment, each 1-point higher gaslighting score was associated with a 0.523-point lower job satisfaction score (95% CI, −0.659 to −0.388; p < .001) and a 0.241-point lower self-rated performance score (95% CI, −0.376 to −0.106; p < .001). Adjusted models explained 17.9% and 6.0% of variance, respectively. Practical implications: Workplace gaslighting warrants attention as a potentially important marker of dysfunctional leadership in nursing workforce research and management. Originality: The study addressed the relationship between supervisor gaslighting and two occupational outcomes among hospital nurses. Gaslighting was more strongly associated with job satisfaction than with self-rated performance. The findings are relevant to hospital nurses, nurse managers and nursing workforce researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsiroumpa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: