Background Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is a promising alternative to open thyroidectomy (OT) for managing differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), especially in select low‐risk patients. This study aimed to compare TORT and OT in patients with DTC < 2 cm using propensity score matching. Methods A retrospective analysis of 355 patients who underwent thyroidectomy between April 2020 and August 2024 was conducted. Of these, 100 underwent TORT and 255 underwent OT. Propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 70 patients per group. Outcomes included operative time, lymph node retrieval, complications, and hospital stay. Results TORT had significantly longer operative times than OT (151.2 ± 42.1 vs. 48.3 ± 11.1 min; p < 0.001). Central lymph node retrieval was comparable (4.5 ± 3.7 vs. 4.4 ± 3.5 nodes; p = 0.975). No cases of permanent vocal cord palsy occurred in either group. Transient hypoparathyroidism occurred in 3 TORT and 2 OT patients; permanent hypoparathyroidism in 1 TORT patient only ( p > 0.05). Hospital stay was slightly longer for TORT (2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 1.8 ± 0.7 days; p = 0.011). No recurrences were observed during the median follow‐up period of 29 months in the TORT group and 44 months in the OT group ( p = 0.238). Conclusions TORT demonstrated comparable short‐term oncologic and surgical outcomes to OT in well‐selected patients with DTC < 2 cm. Further studies with longer follow‐up are needed to confirm long‐term oncologic safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: