“We're reclaiming natural tortillas,” shared Petra, the mother of a peasant family commercializing handmade tortillas in San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Mexico, where machine-made tortillas have dominated for three decades. She alternately deploys a Tsotsil phrasing, bats'i waj , translated as “real,” “true,” or “our tortilla.” In everyday Spanish, people often distinguish between tortillas de maíz and tortillas de Maseca , a distinction between tortillas made from freshly cooked corn and those made from industrially produced ready-mix flour (of the Maseca brand). I argue that the distinction between these categories marks a discursive boundary, endowing handmade tortillas with a quality of “naturalness” perceived as absent from their machine-made counterparts. As Daniel, another vendor, explained: “Some people say that we have the best tortillas in San Cristóbal because they are soft and 100 percent natural corn.” Asked what “natural” meant, he replied: “It's healthier. It doesn't have chemicals. Because Maseca has chemicals, but natural corn doesn't contain anything.” By taking handmade tortillas as a lens through which to understand shifting valuation processes of “naturalness,” I interrogate how food is mobilized as a material response to sentiments of ecological concern and how this, in turn, reconfigures novel forms of labor in the production of such “ecological food.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan Jenatton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: