Corticosteroids are standard of care to slow disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) despite impaired growth and increased fracture risk. Vamorolone, a dissociative corticosteroid approved for DMD, showed stable growth and serum bone turnover markers in the 48-week VISION-DMD study. We compared muscle function and bone health from the non-randomized, open-label, 30-month Phase 2a VBP15-002/003/LTE trials (NCT02760264/NCT02760277/NCT03038399) in treatment-naive boys with DMD, aged 4 to <7 years at baseline, with data from matched corticosteroids-treated boys from FOR-DMD (NCT01603407). Motor function by slope-of-change analysis was evaluated for vamorolone 2–6 mg/kg/d through 30 months compared with propensity score-matched boys from FOR-DMD who received daily prednisone (starting dosage 0.75 mg/kg/d) or deflazacort (0.9 mg/kg/d) for 36 months. Anthropometric and bone assessments were performed in boys on vamorolone for 30 months, including those who received lower dosages during VBP15-002/003 (0.25/0.75 mg/kg/d for 6 months). Vertebral fracture (VF) prevalence was compared with baseline-matched FOR-DMD data. Thirty-month vamorolone VF results were adjusted to approximate expected fracture prevalence at 36 months. All slope-of-change motor function comparisons between vamorolone (N=22) and prednisone (N=32) or deflazacort (N=34) groups yielded no significant differences (p>0.05). Thirty-month height z-scores remained stable from baseline for vamorolone (N=36; +0.078 least-squares-mean change) and decreased from baseline for prednisone (N=27, –0.668; change versus vamorolone: p<0.0001 mixed models for repeat measures) and deflazacort (N=28, –0.928; change versus vamorolone: p<0.0001). VF prevalence on vamorolone (8 VF in 5/39 boys [12.8%]) was ~50% lower than prednisone (13 VF in 7/27 boys [25.9%]) and deflazacort (19 VF in 8/28 boys [28.6%]). Compared with prednisone and deflazacort, vamorolone demonstrated similar motor function efficacy with significantly fewer VF and preserved growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: