Background/Aim: Prognostic significance of ESTRO/EORTC classification (Lancet Oncol. 21:e18-e28) for colorectal cancer patients with oligometastatic disease at uncommon sites unfit for surgery is unclear. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of colorectal cancer patients with post-surgical oligometastatic disease at uncommon sites treated with definitive radiotherapy. We identified eligible patients via in-house databases. Clinical, disease, treatment, and outcome data were obtained through medical-record review, with classifications determined by consensus among the attending physicians. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to investigate the potential prognostic factors including the ESTRO/EORTC classification. We also estimated the incidence of local progression. Results: We identified 59 eligible patients treated from Dec 2012 to Sep 2025. After a median follow-up of 28 months (range=3-145 months), the 5-year OS, PFS, and incidence of local progression were 24%, 10%, 66% respectively. Induced oligoprogression was associated with inferior PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 3.82, p=0.004) but not OS. Conclusion: ESTRO/EORTC classification was associated with outcomes for colorectal cancer patients with oligometastatic disease at uncommon sites treated with definitive radiotherapy. Future studies are needed to validate our findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: