Background: Lower respiratory infections (LRIs) remain the leading infectious cause of child death, yet global frameworks focus on under-5s and the 5–19-year burden lacks systematic quantification. We analyzed the 0–19-year LRI burden in the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2023.Methods: We extracted deaths, DALYs, YLDs, incidence and prevalence for 204 countries, 1990–2023, from the GBD 2023 Results Tool for the official <5-year aggregate plus three older pediatric bands. We computed trends, Socio-demographic Index (SDI) gradients and pandemic-window changes; defined a national episode-fatality ratio proxy (EFR; deaths per 1,000 incident episodes); extrapolated trends to 2030; tested whether school-age mortality divergence tracks pediatric tuberculosis burden; and decomposed deaths into the 26 etiologic fractions.Results: In 2023, LRIs caused 711,713 deaths (95% UI 579,607–843,819), 62.49 million DALYs and 81.05 million incident episodes at ages 0–19 years. The EFR varied 75.6-fold across countries—three times the 25.9-fold national range of incidence—tracked income and, independently, inequality, and widened between low- and high-SDI settings over 1990–2023; incidence and fatality were positively correlated across countries (r = 0.66), and a best-quartile counterfactual implied 80.1% of deaths avertable (upper bound). The global EFR rose silently by 30.4% between 2010 and 2019. Improvement was age-asymmetric: in crude-rate terms, mortality fell 69.1% under 5 years but 39.4% at ages 5–19 years; the 5–19-year share of deaths rose from 6.7% to 14.4%, reaching 16.5% by 2030. Divergence was widest where under-5 progress was fastest and did not track pediatric tuberculosis burden. Streptococcus pneumoniae caused 32.0% of 2023 deaths (47.8% in 1990); influenza and RSV deaths collapsed into 2021 and rebounded fastest thereafter, remaining below 2019. Low-SDI countries carried 61.7% of deaths at 22 times the high-SDI rate. Post-2021 patterns were directional only.Conclusions: Fatality inequality—wider than, and positively correlated with, exposure inequality—now defines the divide, and progress has concentrated under age 5, leaving school-age children and adolescents behind. We propose the EFR as a monitorable indicator, with layered responses: surveillance extension to ages 5–19 years, clinical targeting of high-risk groups, and case-management strengthening in high-burden regions—without routine adolescent vaccine expansion, which current data do not support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: