This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Post-fire soil emissions of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) are important ecosystem nitrogen (N) loss pathways, but their flux dynamics vary widely across studies, making generalizations challenging. Natural variation in burn intensity—or heat energy released during combustionm—may help resolve this variability by mediating the soil physicochemical and biological drivers of these emissions. Here, we used an experimental "pyrocosm" system to evaluate how varying burn intensity influences post-fire NO and N 2 O emissions using soil from a Southern California grassland across 18 weeks. Over several months, we measured soil NO and N 2 O fluxes alongside soil pH, extractable nitrate (NO 3 - ) and ammonium (NH 4 +), net NH 4 + production, net nitrification, soil carbon (C) pools, microbial biomass C, and the potential activities of five extracellular hydrolytic enzymes under Control, Low- (100.1 ± 20.0 o C peak soil temperature at 5 cm depth), and High-intensity (243.8 ± 7.4 o C peak soil temperature at 5 cm depth) burns. Soil NO emissions were not significantly affected by burn intensity. In contrast, N 2 O emissions tripled under low burn intensity relative to unburned controls, but did not differ from controls at high burn intensity. This stimulation of N 2 O emission under low burn intensity was driven by increased denitrification, as supported by elevated soil pH and labile C availability, and an 88% reduction in net nitrification that signaled active NO 3 - consumption. Under high burn intensity, however, severe loss of microbial biomass, soil C, and NO 3 - constrained denitrification, with rising hydrolytic enzyme activities over time suggesting C limitation. Together, these findings demonstrate that post-fire N 2 O emissions reflect a fire intensity-dependent balance between microbial mortality and resource limitation, helping to explain divergent N emissions across ecosystems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czapla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: