Wireless sensing improves the flexibility of condition monitoring but introduces additional uncertainty from sensor faults, packet loss, and communication degradation, which can resemble genuine physical degradation. This study proposes a symmetry-aware framework for resilient monitoring of homologous paired technical systems, defined as pairs of functionally similar components operating under comparable conditions. The framework is based on conditional cross-component symmetry: paired components are not assumed to produce identical measurements, but their normalized multivariate states are expected to retain a statistically consistent healthy relationship once operating conditions and component-specific differences are accounted for. Departures from this relationship support discrimination between physical degradation and sensor- or communication-related anomalies, while the homologous component simultaneously serves as an external source of analytical redundancy for reconstructing unavailable measurements. A twin-engine aircraft configuration is used as a representative pre-deployment case study for prospective wireless engine-health monitoring. Because the real engines are not equipped with the full wireless sensing architecture investigated here, the quantitative evaluation uses a reproducible synthetic paired-engine environment grounded in real operating and maintenance context. Robustness is examined across independent data generations and under controlled nonlinear model-form mismatch. Within this synthetic setting, the results indicate that cross-component information complements conventional local analytical redundancy, particularly for exhaust gas temperature (EGT) reconstruction as local observability deteriorates, while its benefit decreases when the homologous-component information path itself degrades. The study therefore proposes extending symmetry from a diagnostic property to a potential information resource for resilient wireless sensing and provides a basis for subsequent validation with synchronized operational data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor Kabashkin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: