Key result
Septic cardiomyopathy definitions vary widely across studies, with LV dysfunction inconsistently linked to mortality.
Why the study?
Septic cardiomyopathy can be associated with significant mortality across a wide spectrum of left and right ventricular dysfunction, yet it lacks a current unified definition. This review evaluated the imaging modalities and parameters used to define septic cardiomyopathy and its clinical outcomes.
What imaging modalities and parameters are used to define septic cardiomyopathy, and how does imaging-defined cardiac dysfunction relate to mortality in septic patients?
Systematic Review
What imaging modalities and parameters are used to define septic cardiomyopathy, and how does imaging-defined cardiac dysfunction relate to mortality in septic patients?
This systematic review highlights substantial heterogeneity in how septic cardiomyopathy is defined and assessed via cardiac imaging across 87 studies, underscoring the urgent need for a unified diagnostic definition.
High heterogeneity in septic cardiomyopathy definitions warrants caution in outcome interpretation; challenges consensus and leaves open need for standardization.
Background: Septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) has no current unified definition, although it can be associated with significant mortality. It encompasses a wide spectrum of cardiac dysfunction ranging from mild to severe systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of the left and/or right ventricle. The objective of this review is to evaluate the imaging modalities and parameters used to define SCM and the clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, including studies up to August 2025, examining the impact of cardiac dysfunction, specifically related to the systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of the left or right ventricle. We focussed on mortality and comparable phrases as the primary outcome. We considered all cardiac imaging methods. All relevant studies were identified in a search strategy including MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. Results: About 2669 articles were identified, of which 142 full-text publications were evaluated. Final analysis included 87 publications. Forty five articles provided a definition of SCM. Seventy studies used TTE. Eighteen studies associated LV dysfunction to mortality. Thirteen studies found an association between diastolic dysfunction or RV dysfunction and mortality. About 64% of the studies assessed cardiac function within 24-h of admission. Twenty eight studies re-assessed reversibility of cardiac dysfunction. Interpretation: Cardiac dysfunction is commonly reported in the critically ill septic population. There was considerable heterogeneity with regards to the diagnostic criteria of SCM, parameters used to determine cardiac dysfunction, outcomes evaluated, timing of study or assessing reversibility. Given the high prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis, a unified assessment and definition of SCM is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivapathan et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Septic cardiomyopathy (critically ill septic population with systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of the left and/or right ventricle). Cardiac imaging (primarily transthoracic echocardiography) for defining septic cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Mortality and comparable phrases. Imaging-defined septic cardiomyopathy showed high heterogeneity across 87 studies, with 70 using TTE and 18 linking LV dysfunction to mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: